| From: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Date: | 2021-08-04 01:21:32 |
| Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB61139330FC272C2AFD2D98A9FBF19@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 6:03 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:32 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 6:17 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please find attached the latest patch set v102*
> > >
> >
> > I have made minor modifications in the comments and docs, please see
> > attached. Can you please check whether the names of contributors in
> > the commit message are correct or do we need to change it?
>
> The patch applies neatly, the tests pass and documentation built with
> the updates provided. I could not find any comments. The patch looks
> good to me.
>
I did some stress tests on the patch and found no issues.
It also works well when using synchronized replication.
So the patch LGTM.
Regards
Tang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-08-04 01:33:08 | Re: Slow standby snapshot |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-08-04 01:05:06 | Re: Use POPCNT on MSVC |