Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 6:51 AM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 6:03 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:32 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 6:17 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please find attached the latest patch set v102*
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have made minor modifications in the comments and docs, please see
> > > attached. Can you please check whether the names of contributors in
> > > the commit message are correct or do we need to change it?
> >
> > The patch applies neatly, the tests pass and documentation built with
> > the updates provided. I could not find any comments. The patch looks
> > good to me.
> >
>
> I did some stress tests on the patch and found no issues.
> It also works well when using synchronized replication.
> So the patch LGTM.
>

I have pushed this last patch in the series.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.