From: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Added schema level support for publication. |
Date: | 2021-05-25 09:17:05 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB61131C0EA976F67C4D166102FB259@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, May 24, 2021 at 8:31 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The earlier patch does not apply on the head. The v4 patch attached
> has the following changes:
> a) Rebased it on head. b) Removed pubschemas, pubtables columns and
> replaced it with pubtype in pg_publication table. c) List the schemas
> in describe publication. d) List the publication in list schemas. e)
> Add support for "FOR SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA". f) Tab completion for
> "FOR SCHEMA" in create publication and alter publication. g) Included
> the newly added structure type to typedefs.lst
Thanks for your patch.
I ran "make check-world" after applying your patch but it failed on my machine. I saw the following log:
--------------
parallel group (2 tests): subscription publication
publication ... FAILED 108 ms
subscription ... ok 87 ms
diff -U3 /home/fnst/data/postgresql_schema/postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/publication.out /home/fnst/data/postgresql_schema/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/publication.out
--- /home/fnst/data/postgresql_schema/postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/publication.out 2021-05-25 15:44:52.261683712 +0800
+++ /home/fnst/data/postgresql_schema/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/publication.out 2021-05-25 15:48:41.393672595 +0800
@@ -359,10 +359,10 @@
"public"
\dn public;
- List of schemas
- Name | Owner
---------+---------
- public | vignesh
+List of schemas
+ Name | Owner
+--------+-------
+ public | fnst
Publications:
"testpub3_forschema"
--------------
I think the owner of CURRENT_SCHEMA should not be written into publication.out because the result is related to the user.
Maybe we can use "ALTER SCHEMA public OWNER TO owner" to change its default owner before this test case. Thoughts?
Regards
Tang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-05-25 09:17:55 | Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-05-25 09:04:40 | Re: libpq_pipeline in tmp_install |