From: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
Date: | 2025-07-23 07:23:42 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB5716D7FCFF42CBAD2FB31534945FA@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, July 23, 2025 12:08 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 3:51 AM Masahiko Sawada
> <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I've reviewed the 0001 patch and it looks good to me.
> >
>
> Thanks, I have pushed the 0001 patch.
Thanks for pushing. I have rebased the remaining patches.
I have reordered the patches to prioritize the detection of update_deleted as
the initial patch. This can give us more time to consider the new GUC, since the
performance-related aspects have been documented.
One pervious patch used to prove the possibility of allowing changing the
retain_dead_tuples for enabled subscription, has not yet been rebased. I will
rebase that once all the main patches are stable.
Best Regards,
Hou zj
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v52-0003-Re-create-the-replication-slot-if-the-conflict-r.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.5 KB |
v52-0001-Support-the-conflict-detection-for-update_delete.patch | application/octet-stream | 30.1 KB |
v52-0002-Introduce-a-new-GUC-max_conflict_retention_durat.patch | application/octet-stream | 31.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-07-23 07:33:09 | Re: Custom pgstat support performance regression for simple queries |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-07-23 07:03:29 | Re: recoveryStopsAfter is not usable when recovery_target_inclusive is false |