RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

From: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date: 2021-11-25 13:05:43
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB57169DBC045C7C5609FC7EED94629@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thur, Nov 25, 2021 8:29 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 1:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:14 PM Masahiko Sawada
> <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Changed. I've removed first_error_time as per discussion on the
> > > thread for adding xact stats.
> > >
> >
> > We also agreed to change the column names to start with last_error_*
> > [1]. Is there a reason to not make those changes? Do you think that we
> > can change it just before committing that patch? I thought it might be
> > better to do it that way now itself.
>
> Oh, I thought that you think that we change the column names when adding xact
> stats to the view. But these names also make sense even without the xact stats.
> I've attached an updated patch. It also incorporated comments from Vignesh
> and Greg.
>
Hi,

I only noticed some minor things in the testcases

1)
+$node_publisher->append_conf('postgresql.conf',
+ qq[
+logical_decoding_work_mem = 64kB
+]);

It seems we don’t need set the decode_work_mem since we don't test streaming ?

2)
+$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres',
+ q[
+CREATE PUBLICATION tap_pub FOR TABLE test_tab1, test_tab2;
+]);

There are a few places where only one command exists in the 'q[' or 'qq[' like the above code.
To be consistent, I think it might be better to remove the wrap here, maybe we can write like:
$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres',
' CREATE PUBLICATION tap_pub FOR TABLE test_tab1, test_tab2;');

The others LGTM.

Best regards,
Hou zj

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-11-25 13:17:52 Re: Non-decimal integer literals
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-11-25 12:30:11 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side