RE: Added schema level support for publication.

From: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Added schema level support for publication.
Date: 2021-09-02 08:49:52
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB5716750503BDDF73A8AB14C394CE9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From Wed, Sep 1, 2021 2:36 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Schema objects are not part of the publication. Current only TABLES are in
> publications, so I thought that \dRp+ output would just be the of "Tables" in
> the publication. Schemas would not even be displayed at all (except in the
> table name).

I think one use case of schema level publication is it can automatically
publish new table created in the shcema(same as ALL TABLE publication). So,
IMO, \dRp+ should output Schema level publication separately to make the user
aware of it.

Best regards,
Hou zj

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-09-02 08:56:39 Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-09-02 08:49:08 Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication