| From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState? |
| Date: | 2021-03-08 09:18:38 |
| Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB571644819A713F1580C4DEBD94939@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > I am very interested in this patch, and I plan to do some
> > > experiments with the
> > patch.
> > > Can you please rebase the patch because it seems can not applied to
> > > the
> > master now.
> >
> > Thanks for your interest.
> >
> > I was sitting on a rebased version since the bulk FDW patch will cause
> > conflicts, and since this should maybe be built on top of the table-am patch
> (2871).
> > Have fun :)
> Hi,
>
> When I testing with the patch, I found I can not use "\d tablename".
> It reports the following error, it this related to the patch?
Sorry, solved by re-initdb.
Best regards,
houzj
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-03-08 09:20:18 | Re: macOS SIP, next try |
| Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2021-03-08 09:13:07 | Make stream_prepare an optional callback |