Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL

From: Jason Hihn <jhihn(at)paytimepayroll(dot)com>
To: Bruno Baguette <bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL
Date: 2003-01-20 14:42:03
Message-ID: NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPOEBECBAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

It's OLD anyway - almost a year. And they obviously were only using Windows
to test on, so it couldn't have been a serious test ;-)

Just another reason to have native windows support... ahem. ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruno Baguette
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:50 AM
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Server Databases Clash : NO mention of
PostgreSQL ?

Hello,

Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
having added PostgreSQL ?

Here's the URL of the article :
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

Thanks in advance !

-------------------------------------------------
Bruno BAGUETTE - bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heather Carle 2003-01-20 14:46:38 LinuxWorld/Computerworld story on PostgreSQL
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-01-20 08:24:37 Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?