Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?
Date: 2003-01-20 08:24:37
Message-ID: 3E2BFF9D.23075.D9BF0FA@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 18 Jan 2003 at 14:50, Bruno Baguette wrote:
> Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
> theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
> having added PostgreSQL ?
>
> Here's the URL of the article :
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

I read it and it gave me a feeling that benchmarks were run on windows. That
can explain why postgresql is absent from there.

Bye
Shridhar

--
statistics, n.: A system for expressing your political prejudices in convincing
scientific guise.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Hihn 2003-01-20 14:42:03 Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL
Previous Message Justin Clift 2003-01-19 07:07:30 Would having interviews with recognised PostgreSQL people be useful?