Re: Filemaker, PostgreSQL, JDBC and Webobjects

From: "Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com>
To: "Uma Natarajan" <unat(at)engin(dot)umich(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL -jdbc" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Filemaker, PostgreSQL, JDBC and Webobjects
Date: 2002-02-20 18:57:43
Message-ID: NEBBLAAHGLEEPCGOBHDGAEEPEGAA.nickf@ontko.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

It would seem that if there is a way to access filemaker via Java, this
would be possible, but if all of your data lives on the filemaker system,
how does adding postgresql to the mix add value? Can you explain a bit more
about the motivation for this approach?

-Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Uma Natarajan
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: PostgreSQL -jdbc
> Subject: [JDBC] Filemaker, PostgreSQL, JDBC and Webobjects
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a filemaker solution that we have sunk a lot of money and time
> into.
> We would like to use Webobjects as the web application server, connect
> to PostgreSQL via JDBC, and, --- here's the tricky part, --- ask
> PostgreSQL (maybe through stored procedures and more JDBC) to access /
> update our Filemaker database files --- all as the same transaction and
> back to the Webobjects front end.
>
> Is this possible at all?
>
> Thanks
> Uma
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henry 2002-02-20 19:19:14 alternative to postgresql
Previous Message Uma Natarajan 2002-02-20 18:33:08 Filemaker, PostgreSQL, JDBC and Webobjects