Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements
Date: 2023-06-28 04:15:47
Message-ID: MEYP282MB1669FB3A6F7AD9B0D949CA7CB624A@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 11:22, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:53 AM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi, hackers
>>
>> There has $subject that introduced by commit 6b4d23feef6. When we reset
>> the entries
>> if all parameters are avaiable, non-top-level entries removed first, then
>> top-level
>> entries.
>
>
> I did not see the diffs. Maybe uploaded the wrong attachment?
>

My bad! Here is the patch. Thanks!

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix-comment-for-entry_reset.patch text/x-diff 652 bytes
unknown_filename text/plain 25 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-06-28 04:57:09 Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Previous Message Richard Guo 2023-06-28 03:22:55 Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements