Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level

On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 at 12:10, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 at 11:25, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I would suggest a wording more like:
>>
>> "A precondition for using minimal WAL is to disable WAL archiving and
>> streaming replication by setting max_wal_senders to 0, and archive_mode to
>> off."
>>
>> While accurate, the phrase "you must set" just doesn't feel right to me. I
>> also don't like how the proposed sentence (either one) is added separately
>> as opposed to being included in the immediately preceding paragraph. While
>> this limited patch is probably sufficient I would suggest trying to work
>> out a slightly larger patch the improves the wording on the entire existing
>> paragraph while incorporating the reference to max_wal_senders.
>>
>
> Thanks for your review. Modified as your suggestion.
>
>> Note, we seem to be missing the documentation of the default setting for
>> archive_mode.
>>
>
> Add the default value for archive_mode.
>
>> In addition, max_wal_senders could also be changed, adding a sentence like:
>>
>> "If setting max_wal_senders to 0 consider also reducing the amount of WAL
>> produced by changing wal_level to minimal."
>>
>
> Modified.

Attach v3 patch to fix missing close varname tag.

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.