| From: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | fadeymail(at)rambler(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19367: typos in backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c |
| Date: | 2025-12-29 10:35:29 |
| Message-ID: | MEAPR01MB303151496C4A38A8EA4F40F5B6BFA@MEAPR01MB3031.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 at 15:55, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are typos in return type of these functions:
> 1) timestamptz_pl_interval_at_zone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> NOW: PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMP(timestamptz_pl_interval_internal(timestamp,
> span, attimezone));
> SHOULD:
> PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ(timestamptz_pl_interval_internal(timestamp, span,
> attimezone));
> 2) Datum timestamptz_mi_interval_at_zone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> NOW: PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMP(timestamptz_mi_interval_internal(timestamp,
> span, attimezone));
> SHOULD:
> PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ(timestamptz_mi_interval_internal(timestamp, span,
> attimezone));
>
> You’re right — these are just typos, and they don’t affect correctness since both
> ultimately call Int64GetDatum().
> Still, +1 for fixing them for clarity.
The functions timestamptz_pl_interval() and timestamptz_mi_interval() have the
same typos, right?
--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2025-12-29 10:56:01 | Re: BUG #19360: Bug Report: Logical Replication initial sync fails with "conflict=update_origin_differs" PG12 toPG18 |
| Previous Message | Rahila Syed | 2025-12-29 10:25:50 | Re: BUG #19367: typos in backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c |