Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports

From: "Joel Burton" <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date: 2002-05-06 11:54:27
Message-ID: JGEPJNMCKODMDHGOBKDNKEOLCMAA.joel@joelburton.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:36 AM
> To: Joel Burton; Tom Lane; mlw
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
>
>
> > I forwarded the suggestion to my ISP (imeme, a Zope provider), who said
> > that:
> >
> > "This will allow you to run a single postgres in a single jail only one
> > user would have access to it. If you try to run more then one it will
> > try to use the same shared memory and crash."
>
> Not true. But I'll avoid digging up any more on that old issue...

Oh, I'm sure it's not true. But sometimes things end up on the "nyah, nyah,
it's my server and I say so" level. Sigh.

So, I guess that's where it leaves me: waiting for some solution other than
ISP cluefulness. :-)

- J.

Joel BURTON | joel(at)joelburton(dot)com | joelburton.com | aim: wjoelburton
Knowledge Management & Technology Consultant

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-05-06 11:54:52 Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-05-06 11:52:00 Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports