Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Joel Burton <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date: 2002-05-06 12:01:36
Message-ID: 20020506090125.P32524-100000@mail1.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Or changing ISPs to a place more enlightened ...

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Joel Burton wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:36 AM
> > To: Joel Burton; Tom Lane; mlw
> > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
> >
> >
> > > I forwarded the suggestion to my ISP (imeme, a Zope provider), who said
> > > that:
> > >
> > > "This will allow you to run a single postgres in a single jail only one
> > > user would have access to it. If you try to run more then one it will
> > > try to use the same shared memory and crash."
> >
> > Not true. But I'll avoid digging up any more on that old issue...
>
> Oh, I'm sure it's not true. But sometimes things end up on the "nyah, nyah,
> it's my server and I say so" level. Sigh.
>
> So, I guess that's where it leaves me: waiting for some solution other than
> ISP cluefulness. :-)
>
> - J.
>
> Joel BURTON | joel(at)joelburton(dot)com | joelburton.com | aim: wjoelburton
> Knowledge Management & Technology Consultant
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christof Petig 2002-05-06 12:47:31 Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-05-06 11:59:17 Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime