From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: prepareable statements |
Date: | 2002-07-01 01:31:55 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAENOCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> The syntax is largely SQL92 compliant, but not totally. I'm not sure how
> the SQL spec expects parameters to be set up in PREPARE, but I doubt
> it's the same way I used. And the SQL92 spec for EXECUTE is functionally
> similar, but uses a different syntax (EXECUTE ... USING INTO <rel>, I
> think). If someone can decipher the spec on these two points and
> can suggest what the proper syntax should be, let me know.
I'll have a read of the spec for you to see if I can decode something out of
it! I think it's pretty essential we have full standard compliance on this
one!
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-07-01 02:50:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Reduce heap tuple header size |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-06-30 16:24:05 | english doc for tree module |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-07-01 02:50:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Reduce heap tuple header size |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-06-30 00:35:37 | SQL99 doc update |