Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: "Palle Girgensohn" <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Date: 2002-12-31 02:01:34
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAEMOCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > ps. Why is Postgres 7.3 still in ports/databases/postgresql-devel ??
>
> I forgot one other possible answer: perhaps the port maintainer is taking
> a well deserved holiday?

Last time I checked, Palle _was_ the port maintainer :)

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-31 04:36:56 Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?
Previous Message Tara Piorkowski 2002-12-31 01:08:51 Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?