Quick Links

Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?

From:	Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To:	Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc:	Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Date:	2002-12-30 11:35:22
Message-ID:	20021230063425.W47916-100000@m20.unixathome.org
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> ps. Why is Postgres 7.3 still in ports/databases/postgresql-devel ??

I forgot one other possible answer: perhaps the port maintainer is taking
a well deserved holiday?

In response to

Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? at 2002-12-30 03:49:14 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Responses

Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? at 2002-12-30 12:01:06 from Palle Girgensohn
Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped? at 2002-12-31 02:01:34 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Palle Girgensohn	2002-12-30 12:01:06	Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Previous Message	Dan Langille	2002-12-30 11:28:46	Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?