Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Date: 2019-07-02 20:38:32
Message-ID: FBBB931F-3A55-42A4-BCD4-C8BC5143E969@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 2 Jul 2019, at 22:35, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Anyway I'm not objecting to the patch -- I agree that we're already not
> testing translatability and that this patch shouldn't be forced to start
> doing it.

I forgot to add that to my previous email, the patch as it stands in v8 looks
good to me. I’ve missed having this on many occasions.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-07-02 20:56:01 Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-07-02 20:35:26 Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+