| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ahsan hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? |
| Date: | 2022-03-24 23:00:14 |
| Message-ID: | F9CA2AE0-ADFA-40B4-8EC0-6FDABF082968@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 24 Mar 2022, at 23:38, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> It looks like this discussion has reached a bit of an impasse with Tom
> being against this approach and Michael and Daniel being for it. It
> doesn't look like it's going to get committed this commitfest, shall
> we move it forward or mark it returned with feedback?
Lætitia mentioned the other day off-list that she was going to try and update
this patch with the pattern support proposed, so hopefully we will hear from
her shortly on that.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-24 23:18:33 | Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-03-24 22:54:16 | Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE |