From: | "Paragon Corporation" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG |
Date: | 2009-02-07 22:12:55 |
Message-ID: | F953358DC2944D5E829D7805343F3BD1@b |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Thomas Finneid wrote:
>
> I am researching an advocation paper on Postgres. Basically I would
> like to make a list of the most important strengths and weaknesses of
> Postgres compared to a couple of other major databases.
>
> The aim is to have a factual technical background for when advocating
> Postgres to potential users.
We've done comparisons against MySQL and SQL Server (both for regular use
and spatial)
http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/51-Cross-Compare-o
f-SQL-Server,-MySQL,-and-PostgreSQL.html
http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/51-Cross-Compare-o
f-SQL-Server,-MySQL,-and-PostgreSQL.html
Simon Greener has started one too -- he said he'd try to compensate for our
lack of Oracle and DBII mention when he has time. His is more of a spatial
compare though
http://www.spatialdbadvisor.com/SpatialDatabaseComparison/99/spatial-databas
e-comparison
Hope that helps,
Regina
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Finneid | 2009-02-07 23:44:55 | Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-02-07 19:35:17 | Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG |