From: | Thomas Finneid <tfinneid(at)fcon(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | Paragon Corporation <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG |
Date: | 2009-02-07 23:56:03 |
Message-ID: | 498E1F93.8060509@fcon.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Thanks, will have a look at it.
thomas
Paragon Corporation wrote:
>
> Thomas Finneid wrote:
>> I am researching an advocation paper on Postgres. Basically I would
>> like to make a list of the most important strengths and weaknesses of
>> Postgres compared to a couple of other major databases.
>>
>> The aim is to have a factual technical background for when advocating
>> Postgres to potential users.
>
> We've done comparisons against MySQL and SQL Server (both for regular use
> and spatial)
>
> http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/51-Cross-Compare-o
> f-SQL-Server,-MySQL,-and-PostgreSQL.html
>
> http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/51-Cross-Compare-o
> f-SQL-Server,-MySQL,-and-PostgreSQL.html
>
> Simon Greener has started one too -- he said he'd try to compensate for our
> lack of Oracle and DBII mention when he has time. His is more of a spatial
> compare though
>
> http://www.spatialdbadvisor.com/SpatialDatabaseComparison/99/spatial-databas
> e-comparison
>
> Hope that helps,
> Regina
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hans-Juergen Schoenig | 2009-02-09 19:00:47 | Re: White paper on very big databases |
Previous Message | Thomas Finneid | 2009-02-07 23:54:58 | Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG |