Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG

From: Thomas Finneid <tfinneid(at)fcon(dot)no>
To: Paragon Corporation <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG
Date: 2009-02-07 23:56:03
Message-ID: 498E1F93.8060509@fcon.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


Thanks, will have a look at it.

thomas

Paragon Corporation wrote:
>
> Thomas Finneid wrote:
>> I am researching an advocation paper on Postgres. Basically I would
>> like to make a list of the most important strengths and weaknesses of
>> Postgres compared to a couple of other major databases.
>>
>> The aim is to have a factual technical background for when advocating
>> Postgres to potential users.
>
> We've done comparisons against MySQL and SQL Server (both for regular use
> and spatial)
>
> http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/51-Cross-Compare-o
> f-SQL-Server,-MySQL,-and-PostgreSQL.html
>
> http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/51-Cross-Compare-o
> f-SQL-Server,-MySQL,-and-PostgreSQL.html
>
> Simon Greener has started one too -- he said he'd try to compensate for our
> lack of Oracle and DBII mention when he has time. His is more of a spatial
> compare though
>
> http://www.spatialdbadvisor.com/SpatialDatabaseComparison/99/spatial-databas
> e-comparison
>
> Hope that helps,
> Regina
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2009-02-09 19:00:47 Re: White paper on very big databases
Previous Message Thomas Finneid 2009-02-07 23:54:58 Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG