Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-21 20:55:49
Message-ID: F4771198-D048-46E2-8043-B5B688E0FA90@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 21-Jul-08, at 4:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:17:39PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> pgFoundry ain't the CPAN, alas.
>
> Maybe that's the problem that really needs solving?
>
> One of the big Postgres features is its extensibility. I agree that
> the extensions can sometimes be hard to find, but surely the answer to
> that is not an infinitely large source tarball?
>
> A
>
I'd have to agree with Andrew here. Making it easy to get extensions
would solve lots of problems.

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2008-07-21 20:58:46 Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-21 20:38:57 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance