Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-21 20:28:19
Message-ID: 20080721202818.GF32548@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:17:39PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> pgFoundry ain't the CPAN, alas.

Maybe that's the problem that really needs solving?

One of the big Postgres features is its extensibility. I agree that
the extensions can sometimes be hard to find, but surely the answer to
that is not an infinitely large source tarball?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-21 20:33:55 Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2008-07-21 20:21:50 Re: [patch] plproxy v2