Re: Question about criteria for adding items to the v19 open items wiki page

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about criteria for adding items to the v19 open items wiki page
Date: 2026-04-23 05:42:25
Message-ID: F2C03AAC-4EF3-442C-A90F-769ADAB490E7@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 23, 2026, at 13:33, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> In the Open Issues section, I see the first item has no owner listed, so I assume we should add new items to the top of the list, and then, once they are confirmed, either an owner will be assigned, or the item will be moved to “Won’t Fix” or removed. Is that right?
>
> Further down it says "add new items to the bottom". I agree
> that note is poorly placed.
>
> regards, tom lane

Ah… I see the note below the open issue list. Got it.

I will add a few items.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 南拓弥 2026-04-23 05:46:53 Re: Warn on missing replica identity in CREATE/ALTER PUBLICATION
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-04-23 05:33:16 Re: Question about criteria for adding items to the v19 open items wiki page