Re: Question about criteria for adding items to the v19 open items wiki page

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about criteria for adding items to the v19 open items wiki page
Date: 2026-04-23 05:33:16
Message-ID: 1378960.1776922396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In the Open Issues section, I see the first item has no owner listed, so I assume we should add new items to the top of the list, and then, once they are confirmed, either an owner will be assigned, or the item will be moved to “Won’t Fix” or removed. Is that right?

Further down it says "add new items to the bottom". I agree
that note is poorly placed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-04-23 05:42:25 Re: Question about criteria for adding items to the v19 open items wiki page
Previous Message David Rowley 2026-04-23 05:32:43 Re: [PATCH] Fix hashed ScalarArrayOp semantics for NULL LHS with non-strict comparators