| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Васильев Дмитрий <d(dot)vasilyev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>,"pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |
| Date: | 2016-03-21 04:51:03 |
| Message-ID: | F1AED4D9-A3E5-41D4-9F72-5624FBC428B9@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On March 21, 2016 5:12:38 AM GMT+01:00, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>The article pointed by you justifies that the way ResetEvent is done by
>patch is correct. I am not sure, but you can weigh, if there is a need
>of
>comment so that if we want enhance this part of code (or want to write
>something similar) in future, we don't need to rediscover this fact.
I've added a reference in a comment.
Did you have a chance of running the patched versions on windows?
I plan to push this sometime today, so I can get on to some performance patches I was planning to look into committing.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-03-21 04:56:04 | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |
| Previous Message | James Sewell | 2016-03-21 04:18:39 | Re: Choosing parallel_degree |