Re: libpqxx Large Objects

From: "Key88 SF" <key88sf(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpqxx Large Objects
Date: 2003-01-09 00:23:18
Message-ID: F181CJLgRkQ9ZPWv1QJ000270f6@hotmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Really? Where do you see that? I'm looking at the libpq - C library
documentation, section 2, describing large objects. I don't see any mention
of the interface being deprecated.

-Dave

>From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
>To: Key88 SF <key88sf(at)hotmail(dot)com>
>CC: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpqxx Large Objects
>Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:30:29 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mc2-f16.law16.hotmail.com ([65.54.237.23]) by
>mc2-s5.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 8 Jan
>2003 09:30:41 -0800
>Received: from relay2.pgsql.com ([64.49.215.143]) by
>mc2-f16.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 8 Jan
>2003 09:30:41 -0800
>Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])by
>relay2.pgsql.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid 5C18BEE1718; Wed, 8 Jan 2003
>12:30:32 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])by postgresql.org
>(Postfix) with ESMTP id F3192475F34for <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>;
>Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:30:28 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from mxzilla3.xs4all.nl (mxzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.49])by
>postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115B5475EB2for
><pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:30:28 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from xs1.xs4all.nl (xs1.xs4all.nl [194.109.3.11])by
>mxzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h08HUTbn061180;Wed, 8 Jan
>2003 18:30:30 +0100 (CET)
>Received: (from jtv(at)localhost)by xs1.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>h08HUTk80001;Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:30:29 +0100 (CET)(envelope-from jtv)
>Message-ID: <20030108173029(dot)GA62724(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
>Mail-Followup-To: Key88 SF
><key88sf(at)hotmail(dot)com>,pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
>References: <F51y8sujox4HXYaXC6d00002a7f(at)hotmail(dot)com>
>In-Reply-To: <F51y8sujox4HXYaXC6d00002a7f(at)hotmail(dot)com>
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
>X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
>Precedence: bulk
>Sender: pgsql-interfaces-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Return-Path: pgsql-interfaces-owner+M3543(at)postgresql(dot)org
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2003 17:30:41.0184 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[AA88CA00:01C2B73B]
>
>On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:00:07AM +0000, Key88 SF wrote:
> >
> > I was looking for support for Large Objects with libpqxx, but couldn't
>find
> > anything special. Does that mean I need to use the libpq large-object
> > functions? Any plans for adding LO support in the future?
>
>AFAIK libpq's large object support is itself obsolete. Documentation
>suggests the functionality has been integrated in regular tables.
>
>
>Jeroen
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-01-09 00:49:41 Re: ODBC fix
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2003-01-09 00:00:34 Re: MOVE LAST: why?