Re: Slightly improve initdb --sync-only option's help message

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slightly improve initdb --sync-only option's help message
Date: 2021-07-29 23:37:56
Message-ID: EF354CDF-4FEF-4D85-B3EC-8B4498523BC1@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/29/21, 2:11 AM, "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> I think removing the word "only" here is a net loss, since it IMO clearly
> conveyed that this option isn't doing any of the other initdb duties. The
> documentation states it in more words, but the help output must be brief so I
> think "only" is a good keyword.

I've attached a new version of the patch in which I've attempted to
address both sets of feedback.

Nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-improve-initdb-sync-only-help-message-and-docs.patch application/octet-stream 1.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2021-07-30 00:34:01 Re: A qsort template
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-07-29 23:27:32 Re: Use WaitLatch for {pre, post}_auth_delay instead of pg_usleep