Re: Transaction timeout

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, 邱宇航 <iamqyh(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andrew Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transaction timeout
Date: 2024-01-31 09:57:32
Message-ID: EBD6C037-8C85-4427-BC0C-B818D6036B89@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 31 Jan 2024, at 14:27, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> LGTM.
>
> If there is no other objections, I'll change it to ready for committer
> next Monday.

I think we have a quorum, so I decided to go ahead and flipped status to RfC. Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Junwang Zhao 2024-01-31 09:58:00 Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2024-01-31 09:55:13 Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?