| From: | bertrand HARTWIG <hartwig(dot)bertrand(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: About asynchronous I/O |
| Date: | 2026-06-23 12:19:14 |
| Message-ID: | EB10F801-880E-4D31-9722-8BDAB4BF690C@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Very usefull on SSD AND nvme ! (low latency on IOPs). But the higher the disk latency, the greater the gains you will notice.
On SSD i observed 200%
> Le 23 juin 2026 à 14:02, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 7:26 AM bertrand HARTWIG <hartwig(dot)bertrand(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:hartwig(dot)bertrand(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The size of the database is clearly not important.
>>
>> What matters are queries that are not already cached and that perform I/O.
>>
>> With async I/O, you can see I/O performance improvements of up to 200%–300%. The higher the disk latency, the greater the gains you will notice.
>>
>
> So, not so useful on SSD/NVMe?
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bertrand
>>
>>
>>> Le 23 juin 2026 à 09:55, ek ek <livadidrive(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:livadidrive(at)gmail(dot)com>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> Are any of you running PostgreSQL 18 on production environments sized between 1 to 3TB? Does the 'asynchronous I/O (AIO) subsystem' deliver a significant performance increase? Also, has anyone had the opportunity to benchmark it against v17?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
> <Redacted> lobster!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | JOHN WIENCEK | 2026-06-23 13:04:23 | Re: About asynchronous I/O |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2026-06-23 12:02:54 | Re: About asynchronous I/O |