Re: About asynchronous I/O

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About asynchronous I/O
Date: 2026-06-23 12:02:54
Message-ID: CANzqJaAKAzYaGfPFLzt4ZZDs6sE5KGWuMmGWQ1oQYeC-wzHk_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 7:26 AM bertrand HARTWIG <hartwig(dot)bertrand(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The size of the database is clearly not important.
>
> What matters are queries that are not already cached and that perform I/O.
>
> With async I/O, you can see I/O performance improvements of up to
> 200%–300%. The higher the disk latency, the greater the gains you will
> notice.
>

So, not so useful on SSD/NVMe?

> Regards,
>
> Bertrand
>
> Le 23 juin 2026 à 09:55, ek ek <livadidrive(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
>
> Hello everyone,
> Are any of you running PostgreSQL 18 on production environments sized
> between 1 to 3TB? Does the 'asynchronous I/O (AIO) subsystem' deliver a
> significant performance increase? Also, has anyone had the opportunity to
> benchmark it against v17?
>
>
>

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bertrand HARTWIG 2026-06-23 12:19:14 Re: About asynchronous I/O
Previous Message bertrand HARTWIG 2026-06-23 11:25:58 Re: About asynchronous I/O