Re: stderr & win32 admin check

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stderr & win32 admin check
Date: 2004-06-15 20:17:41
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4A9A3@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 15 June 2004 19:11
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Magnus Hagander; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] stderr & win32 admin check
>
> So? I don't follow why "run it as a service" isn't a
> sufficient answer, and indeed the preferred way to do it.

It is the preferred method, however two reasons not to spring to mind:
first, I bet you and most others on this list might not want to do that
if forced to develop on a Windows box, and second, you can only run one
instance as a service on a single machine.

Like I said though, I run XP so it's not a problem for me - I'm just
sticking up for the NT4 users it was decided we should support.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-15 20:40:45 Re: stderr & win32 admin check
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-15 20:04:53 Re: Fix for erroneous warning on Shutdown