From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Antonio Pennino" <a(dot)pennino(at)nocerainformatica(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: problem with CVS version |
Date: | 2004-07-27 13:56:22 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A748B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antonio Pennino [mailto:a(dot)pennino(at)nocerainformatica(dot)net]
> Sent: 27 July 2004 14:18
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [ODBC] problem with CVS version
>
> Subject: RE: [ODBC] problem with CVS version
> Date sent: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:27:30 +0100
> From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
> To: "Antonio Pennino"
> <a(dot)pennino(at)nocerainformatica(dot)net>
> Copies to: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>
> > Hmm, there's nothing in there that looks odd to me, but then I've
> > never dug quite this deep into the driver before. I assume
> '#eliminato'
> > translates to '#deleted'?
>
> Yes, but is NOT only a MS-ACCESS 97 problem because with my
> dump utility a see m_nSQLType (MFC) = -9 !!!
As I said, -9 is SQL_WVARCHAR which is a perfectly valid type. Your
application is calling the *W version of various SQL functions (or the
driver manager is mapping your calls to them because it is detecting
that your app is Unicode aware - as per the ODBC spec), so it should be
able to recognise a unicode data type.
> Perhaps the ::SQLDescribeCol() is deprecated for psql but MFC
> use it and i CAN NOT write my code without the MFC framework.
SQLDescribeCol is most certainly supported.
> If, instead of the CVS version and/or the beta version from
> Dave, i use an older (7.1.2004) version of psqlodbc.dll,
> m_nSQLType is = 12.
Yes, because the older driver did not support unicode.
Regard, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-07-27 15:57:57 | Re: problem with CVS version |
Previous Message | Antonio Pennino | 2004-07-27 13:18:25 | Re: problem with CVS version |