From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL |
Date: | 2006-06-26 15:45:58 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388BA5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: 26 June 2006 15:03
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Robert Treat; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Andrew
> Dunstan; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re:
> [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL
>
>
> Ok, I talked with them now. They need the following information:
>
> - What type of hardware do we need? Is an Opteron enough?
> Memory? Disk?
Depends what it was used for.
> - Do we need a private box, or is a VM enough?
As above.
> - What is the average traffic of our web servers?
Dunno, but not a huge figure - the network is heavily specc'ed towards
high availability and coping with a good /.ing. Individual servers tend
to be very lightly loaded.
> Bandwith is not cheap in Turkey, so they are inclined to put
> that server
> somewhere outside Turkey.
>
> They are ready to proceed, they just want to learn the details.
Well I think Robert is suggesting we setup a box with a bunch of VM's
running different OS's as buildfarm clients. I don't know how useful
that would be, but at the least, with VMWare (or Bochs if it's mature
enough now) and a Windows licence it could run nightly builds of Mingw
and Cygwin, and with just VMWare it could do Solaris x86, and an
assortment of Linuxes and *BSDs.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PFC | 2006-06-26 15:55:08 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-26 15:45:05 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression |