Re: Avoiding data loss with synchronous replication

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Avoiding data loss with synchronous replication
Date: 2021-07-26 17:14:47
Message-ID: E28359E1-9B07-4541-A2B9-544C19CEDC67@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/24/21, 5:25 PM, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> First, from the user experience side of things, the issue is that this seems
> to propose violating read-your-own-writes. Within a single connection to a
> single node. Which imo is *far* worse than seeing writes that haven't yet been
> acknowledged as replicated after a query cancel.

Right. I suspect others will have a similar opinion.

Nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-07-26 17:15:22 Re: Skip temporary table schema name from explain-verbose output.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-07-26 17:14:20 Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables