pgsql: Doc: in back branches, don't call it a row constructor if it isn

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Doc: in back branches, don't call it a row constructor if it isn
Date: 2016-11-22 23:07:54
Message-ID: E1c9KAM-0005aZ-SJ@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Doc: in back branches, don't call it a row constructor if it isn't really.

Before commit 906bfcad7, we were not actually processing the righthand
side of a multiple-column assignment in UPDATE as a row constructor:
it was just a parenthesized list of expressions. Call it that rather
than risking confusion by people who would expect the documented behaviors
of row constructors to apply.

Back-patch to 9.5; before that, the text correctly described the construct
as a "list of independent expressions".

Discussion: <16288(dot)1479610770(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>

Branch
------
REL9_6_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/51aebcd78a4a0674737319a804ff761800fa6830

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/ref/update.sgml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-11-22 23:35:28 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Doc: improve documentation about composite-value usage.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-11-22 22:56:58 pgsql: Doc: improve documentation about composite-value usage.