Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Date: 2006-08-25 17:49:05
Message-ID: E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579014DB7DD@m0143.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > precedent syntax (Oracle, Informix) uses the keyword ONLINE
> at the end:
> > CREATE INDEX blabla_x0 ON blabla (a,b) ONLINE;
>
> That was what the patch originally used, but it was changed
> because it made difficult for psql to auto-complete that.

That is imho not enough of a reason to divert.

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-08-25 17:57:58 Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-25 17:48:06 Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build