Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Date: 2006-08-25 17:48:06
Message-ID: 3208.1156528086@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> precedent syntax (Oracle, Informix) uses the keyword ONLINE at the end:
> CREATE INDEX blabla_x0 ON blabla (a,b) ONLINE;

We rejected that one already ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD 2006-08-25 17:49:05 Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-25 17:46:11 Re: [HACKERS] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case