Re: Making pg_rewind faster

From: Justin Kwan <justinpkwan(at)outlook(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh <vignesh(at)cloudflare(dot)com>, "jkwan(at)cloudflare(dot)com" <jkwan(at)cloudflare(dot)com>, vignesh ravichandran <admin(at)viggy28(dot)dev>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Making pg_rewind faster
Date: 2022-07-18 17:14:00
Message-ID: DM6PR03MB4570343C1D8925AF7909E167A08C9@DM6PR03MB4570.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom,

Thank you for taking a look at this and that sounds good. I will send over a patch compatible with Postgres v16.

Justin
________________________________
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Sent: July 17, 2022 2:40 PM
To: Justin Kwan <justinpkwan(at)outlook(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; vignesh <vignesh(at)cloudflare(dot)com>; jkwan(at)cloudflare(dot)com <jkwan(at)cloudflare(dot)com>; vignesh ravichandran <admin(at)viggy28(dot)dev>; hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Making pg_rewind faster

Justin Kwan <justinpkwan(at)outlook(dot)com> writes:
> I've also attached the pg_rewind optimization patch file for Postgres version 14.4. The previous patch file targets version Postgres version 15 Beta 1/2.

It's very unlikely that we would consider committing such changes into
released branches. In fact, it's too late even for v15. You should
be submitting non-bug-fix patches against master (v16-to-be).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-07-18 17:30:27 Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-07-18 16:36:19 Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly