Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly
Date: 2022-07-18 17:30:27
Message-ID: 766847.1658165427@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2022-Jul-18, Richard Guo wrote:
>> BTW, not related to this patch, the new lines for parallel_aware check
>> in setrefs.c are very wide. How about wrap them to keep consistent with
>> arounding codes?

> Not untrue! Something like this, you mean? Fixed the nearby typo while
> at it.

WFM. (I'd fixed the comment typo in my patch, but I don't mind if
you get there first.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2022-07-18 17:42:47 Re: Convert planner's AggInfo and AggTransInfo to Nodes
Previous Message Justin Kwan 2022-07-18 17:14:00 Re: Making pg_rewind faster