Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.

From: "Matheus Alcantara" <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Kirill Reshke" <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Alexander Korotkov" <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Dmitry Koval" <d(dot)koval(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
Date: 2026-04-22 10:58:06
Message-ID: DHZMP9TM3U3C.2M1RS15KTDWFE@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed Apr 22, 2026 at 7:48 AM -03, Kirill Reshke wrote:
>> +-- An index created directly on a partition has no parent in the partitioned
>> +-- index tree; merge must ignore such indexes (they disappear with the old
>> +-- partition).
>> +CREATE INDEX part_extdep_3_extra_idx ON part_extdep_3(x);
>> +ALTER TABLE part_extdep MERGE PARTITIONS (part_extdep_merged, part_extdep_3)
>> + INTO part_extdep_merged2;
>> +SELECT relname FROM pg_class
>> +WHERE relname LIKE 'part_extdep_merged2%idx' ORDER BY relname;
>
> Looks like this test is also redundant? This does not test new DEPENDS ON logic.
>

I think that this test is useful to ensure that we correctly skip such
indexes created directly on a specific partition. Perhaps we can include
an ALTER INDEX ... DEPENDS ON for this specific index to make it more
consistent with the other tests?

--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2026-04-22 10:59:22 Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
Previous Message Matheus Alcantara 2026-04-22 10:53:04 Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.