| From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dmitry Melekhov *EXTERN*" <dm(at)belkam(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: please explain vacuum with WAL |
| Date: | 2008-07-08 12:15:31 |
| Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2024B0ABA@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> So, if I have database backup and WAL generated after this backup, I can
> do recovery, this mean WAL already contains all changes to database,
> without vacuum. Could you tell me what is wrong in my sentence?
VACUUM *is* a change to the database.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2008-07-08 12:17:41 | Re: select command doesnot work |
| Previous Message | Leif B. Kristensen | 2008-07-08 12:12:42 | Re: select command doesnot work |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ram Ravichandran | 2008-07-08 19:45:07 | parameters in pg_conf |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2008-07-08 11:33:29 | Re: please explain vacuum with WAL |