Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks
Date: 2025-12-24 07:02:53
Message-ID: D5BBA76F-30A0-4461-8567-F35FC74DADED@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Dec 24, 2025, at 14:57, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Chao-san, Peter and David for reviewing the patch. I also felt
>> the version shared by Peter is more appropriate. I have made the
>> suggested changes by David.
>>
>
> Patch v2 LGTM.
>
+1

--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message preTham 2025-12-24 07:05:31 Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather thanROLERECURSE_PRIVS?
Previous Message Peter Smith 2025-12-24 06:57:54 Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks