Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks
Date: 2025-12-24 07:22:54
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaL2CJf6yCppioULz4g0Tn7dHFN0rA41LN6kozHbxh5wQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 12:03 AM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Dec 24, 2025, at 14:57, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Chao-san, Peter and David for reviewing the patch. I also felt
> >> the version shared by Peter is more appropriate. I have made the
> >> suggested changes by David.
> >>
> >
> > Patch v2 LGTM.
> >
> +1
>
>
>
WFM

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2025-12-24 07:27:50 doc: update the default of data checksums in the doc of pg_rewind
Previous Message preTham 2025-12-24 07:05:31 Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather thanROLERECURSE_PRIVS?