Re: Listmail disappearing: bad spam filters?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Listmail disappearing: bad spam filters?
Date: 2006-10-27 00:13:24
Message-ID: D58A7CBFAA140E4E2DDD9979@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

'k, let me look into this ... I thought I had fixed the "blank ones", but
apparently must have missed a case :(

- --On Thursday, October 26, 2006 14:43:20 -0700 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
wrote:

> Marc,
>
>> Just want to confirm that you are now receiving the POST messages from
>> majordomo whenever a message auto-rejected? I know I'm getting them
>> here, and all look legit, *but* I'm not looking for anyone in particular
>> either ...
>
> OK, I just had a test case. I AM getting the POST messages, but their
> content is not at all informative. For example:
>
> ----------
> The command:
>   "(post to pgsql-performance)"
>
> issued by:
>   "Tom Darci" <tom(at)nuws(dot)com>
>
> was executed with status:
>   0 (failure)
>
> in session:
>   0f93dc9192214f4cf0cf3e54f35ac77d5bd4cfb2
>
> from the resend interface, taking 0.264 seconds.
> ------------
>
> This doesn't tell me anything about why Tom's post was rejected, just that
> it was (duplicate, in this case).
>
> --
> --Josh
>
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFQU8k4QvfyHIvDvMRArxZAKDEZBYiR2SrWrfo+s425mU6JDsllgCfT2Lw
bYYSaH73E/oVQNaRhDj+nZk=
=x8Qs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2006-10-27 16:01:03 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-10-26 23:32:59 Re: On what we want to support: travel?