| From: | "Jim Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig" <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Paolo Magnoli" <pmagnoli(at)systemevolution(dot)it>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <eg(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: R: feature proposal ... |
| Date: | 2005-09-22 20:36:46 |
| Message-ID: | D1D2D51E3BE3FC4E98598248901F7594027E561D@ausmail2k4.aus.pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Also, as nifty as this might be, we should also be prepared
> for people
> to complain that it runs a lot slower than vanilla COPY, because it
> surely will.
At which point we point out to them that it's also much faster than any of the other alternatives. :)
But yes, we should mention it in the docs, if for no other reason than to help prevent people from doing COPY (SELECT * FROM table) TO ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-09-22 20:39:10 | Re: R: feature proposal ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-22 20:25:53 | Re: R: feature proposal ... |