| From: | Thomas F(dot)O'Connell <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | chinni <naveen(dot)bysani(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path. |
| Date: | 2004-07-27 09:10:34 |
| Message-ID: | D143E213-DFAC-11D8-A715-000D93AE0944@sitening.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
It's a master-multislave replication system that has a pretty robust
development cycle. It just reached a 1.0 release.
Whether any solution becomes a core part of the distribution remains, I
think, to be seen.
-tfo
On Jul 27, 2004, at 4:03 AM, chinni wrote:
> Postgres-R is a multi server (write anywhere) replication tool
> which is possibly important for any enterprise if they want to shift
> to postgres.
>
> Did you guys debate on merging it.
>
> As of now They are working on postgres 7.2 and developing postgres-R.
> They plan to do it for 7.4 as well, why not merge these things.
>
> Is the postgres team planing to come up with a similar tool themselves
> ?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-07-27 09:39:54 | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
| Previous Message | chinni | 2004-07-27 09:03:16 | why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path. |