Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Date: 2023-03-23 22:36:22
Message-ID: CF9D0132-FCD7-4E7B-952D-7E4CA7A1C2ED@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 18 Mar 2023, at 23:07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> BTW, a better test than the one above would be
>
> $package->isa("PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster")

Attached is a quick updated v3 of the patch which, to the best of my Perl
abilities, tries to address the comments raised here.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Refactor-background-psql-TAP-functions.patch application/octet-stream 29.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2023-03-23 22:40:55 Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2023-03-23 22:31:23 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page