Re: Please consider using Maven

Maven definitely can handle that, one solution can be using profiles for
different jdbc versions.
(http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html)

For all those "if then include" entries in build.xml:
<include name="${package}/jdbc3/Jdbc3Array.java" if="jdbc3"/>

It can be archived by use maven compiler plugin, includes filter
(http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/compile-mojo.html)

<build>
<sourceDirectory>../src/main/java</sourceDirectory>

<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.2</version>
<configuration>
<includes><include>**/jdbc3/**</include></includes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>

I do see the benefit for pgsql-jdbc project to migrating to
maven. The standard and conversion brought by maven makes it much easier
to write patch and test for a project without have to spend time read a
customized ant build.xml and README for some basic jobs
(compile/test/build). I once wanted to contribute back an hstore
enhancement but gave up after spending 5 mins into build.xml.(Yes, I am
lazy. I don't want to spend more than 5 mins to understand a customized
build/test process.)

Here is a half way migration (example only, I am not sure if I would have
time to complete it), only fixed to do one job: compile for jdbc4:
https://github.com/sinbadblue/pgjdbc/tree/maven_migration

To reduce the initial conversion work, I only changed directories
structure and leverage existing ant target "driver" to build for java
version 1.6(jdbc4 flavor) only.
__________________________

Shijun Kong

On 8/2/12 8:07 PM, "Craig Ringer" <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:

>On 08/03/2012 01:11 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I would have no problem publishing to maven if someone wants to do the
>> work to make it happen.
>
>I work with Maven a lot and like it. Mostly. I thought about trying to
>Mavenize the JDBC driver a while ago but before I proposed it here I
>took at look at the build.xml and decided it wasn't so important after
>all ;-)
>
>PgJDBC has all that that funky business for handling different JDBC
>levels and compilation with different JDKs. It's not especially
>challenging to do with Maven, but it complicates things a bit. When I
>last looked I didn't know enough about Maven to be able to tackle it.
>
>Knowing that you're OK with moving it over to Maven is interesting. If
>I'm ever feeling the lack of pain and suffering in my day to day
>development I might give the conversion a go ;-)
>
>--
>Craig Ringer
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

This email message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, fax or email and delete the message and all attachments to the message. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Investor Analytics LLC.